Download Privatization in Malaysia: Regulation, Rent-Seeking and by Jeff Tan PDF

By Jeff Tan

Lately, privatisation has fallen out of favour in lots of nations as the underlying political elements haven't been good understood. This booklet examines Malaysia’s privatisation programme, targeting how political constraints ended in the failure of 4 significant privatisations: the nationwide sewerage corporation (IWK), Kuala Lumpur mild Rail Transit (LRT), nationwide airline (MAS), and nationwide motor vehicle corporation (Proton). It considers why constructing international locations equivalent to Malaysia will need to embark on privatisation, the standards that bring about coverage failure, and what's had to make it paintings. It exhibits basically that political causes using privatisation usually dominate merely fiscal concerns, and hence it can be crucial to examine privatisation in the particular state context. It argues that failure within the Malaysian case used to be as a result of political issues that compromised institutional layout and regulatory enforcement, resulting in difficulties linked to corruption. It concludes that privatisation doesn't inevitably enhance incentives for potency or increase the finance on hand for capital funding, and that profitable privatisation is determined by the state’s institutional and political means to layout and deal with a suitable set of subsidies. total, this booklet is a accomplished exam of privatisation in Malaysia, offering very important insights for knowing the political economic climate of this method in different constructing nations.

Show description

Read Online or Download Privatization in Malaysia: Regulation, Rent-Seeking and Policy Failure (Routledge Malaysian Studies Series) PDF

Similar economic policy & development books

The Plot Against Social Security: How the Bush Plan Is Endangering Our Financial Future

Relentless and ominous, the drumbeat echoes around the land: Social defense is at the verge of financial ruin. The caution has been repeated so usually that it has develop into a gloomy article of religion for the thousands of american citizens who pay Social defense taxes and count on to assemble advantages sometime. however it is flatly unfaithful.

Extra info for Privatization in Malaysia: Regulation, Rent-Seeking and Policy Failure (Routledge Malaysian Studies Series)

Sample text

G. see Hemming and Mansoor 1988; Kikeri et al. 1994; Plane 1997). The failure here to account for the political motivations behind privatization restricts our understanding of the character of privatization in many developing countries in terms of what is privatized, how and to whom, and the effectiveness of related institutions and state intervention, which are central to our assessment of privatization. As such, this approach cannot explain why privatization may fail, and why weak institutions persist.

Political and nationalistic considerations also prevent privatization to specific ethnic groups or foreign interests (Cook and Kirkpatrick 1988; Parker and Kirkpatrick 2003), further Privatization, rents and rent-seeking 27 limiting the pool of acceptable candidates. As such, focusing on corruption ignores the intrinsically political nature of privatization which often cannot be undertaken using transparent processes. Here, weak institutions are often the outcome of political factors as well as a cause of failure.

Hence, selection here will not necessarily be on the basis of the most competitive bidder but rather the best politically connected bidder. Indeed, this is an important criterion for foreign companies seeking a local partner to secure privatization contracts in developing countries. More importantly, inappropriate candidate choice may not lead to failure if this can be remedied through learning rents and clearly specified incentives and penalties. The key difference between developed and developing countries in the context of asymmetric information is that inappropriate candidates can be more easily disciplined through the threat of replacement in the former where there are less constraints on entrepreneurial capacity.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.77 of 5 – based on 27 votes