By Nathan M. Jensen
What makes a rustic appealing to overseas traders? To what quantity do stipulations of governance and politics subject? This publication offers the main systematic exploration so far of those an important questions on the nexus of politics and economics. utilizing quantitative info and interviews with funding merchandising enterprises, funding place specialists, political possibility insurers, and determination makers at multinational companies, Nathan Jensen arrives at a stunning end: nations could be competing for foreign capital, yet executive economic policy--both taxation and spending--has little influence on multinationals' funding decisions.
even if govt coverage has a constrained skill to figure out styles of overseas direct funding (FDI) inflows, political associations are primary to explaining why a few international locations are extra profitable in attracting foreign capital. First, democratic associations reduce political dangers for multinational companies. certainly, they bring about great quantities of international direct funding. moment, politically federal associations, unlike fiscally federal associations, reduce political hazards for multinationals and make allowance host international locations to draw larger degrees of FDI inflows. 3rd, the overseas financial Fund, frequently pointed out as a catalyst for selling international funding, really deters multinationals from funding in nations below IMF courses. Even after controlling for the standards that lead nations to hunt IMF help, IMF agreements are linked to a lot reduce degrees of FDI inflows.
Read or Download Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment PDF
Similar economic policy & development books
Relentless and ominous, the drumbeat echoes around the land: Social defense is at the verge of financial ruin. The caution has been repeated so frequently that it has turn into a dark article of religion for the thousands of usa citizens who pay Social defense taxes and count on to assemble advantages sometime. however it is flatly unfaithful.
Additional resources for Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment
Conversely, some multinationals did highlight the importance of local and regional governments in lobbying on behalf of the ﬁrm. This evidence was less systematic than the evidence linking democracy to lower political risks. Finally, none of the multinationals argued that IMF conditionality helped reduce political risks or ensured a more favorable macroeconomic environment. Some ﬁrms, such as UBS, argued that IMF capital can be important, but IMF conditions are often aimed at performance targets and not appropriate policies.
13 In Mexico, FDI concentrated in manufacturing industries designed for export, such as the automotive industry, and M U LT I N AT I O N A L S A N D D O M E S T I C G O V E R N M E N T S 31 local ﬁrms supplied them. Although FDI had a major impact on the export position of Mexico, the impact was more modest in Argentina. A large quantity of FDI investment in Argentina served the domestic market, having no impact on the export position of the country. In Chile and Colombia, FDI ﬂooded into natural resources: mining in Chile and oil and mining in Colombia.
The selection-corrected estimates of the effects of democracy emerge roughly three times larger than the OLS results. Democratic institutions positively affect FDI inﬂows even more than originally estimated. The ﬁnal set of empirical tests explores the credibility-enhancing nature of democratic institutions by analyzing the effects of democracy on country sovereign debt ratings for eighty countries from 1980 to 1998. While not a direct test of the credibility-improving character of democratic institutions for multinational investors, it does help us more clearly examine the causal mechanism.