By Mendeltje van Keulen
The eu Union has a big impact at the executive and rules of its member states. it's therefore stunning that the ways that nationwide governments try to form ecu rules is a subject heavily understudied. This ebook discusses proper educational insights and offers a framework for analysing nationwide curiosity illustration. The empirical half discusses the ecu coverage of the Dutch executive in the course of the Nineteen Nineties and provides a reconstuction of the negotiations on inner marketplace directives. It thereby deals either for teachers and practitioners a transparent oversight of the making of ecu poliices and the proper moments and tools for nationwide curiosity illustration. This name comes in the OAPEN Library - http://www.oapen.org. [C:\Users\Microsoft\Documents\Calibre Library]
Read Online or Download Going Europe or Going Dutch (Clingendael Dissertations) PDF
Best politics & government books
Фортификационные сооружения Линии Зигфрида
Publication by way of Ries, Karl
Landtagswahlkämpfe sind nicht einfach Wahlkämpfe „zweiter Klasse“. Im Mehrebenensystem der Bundesrepublik stellen sie eine besondere Kampagnenform dar. Der Autor untersucht corporation, Programmatik und Instrumente der Wahlkämpfe in Nordrhein-Westfalen 2010, Baden-Württemberg 2011 und Sachsen-Anhalt 2011.
Dieses Grundlagenwerk informiert umfassend und systematisch über den Werterahmen, den das Grundgesetz seit 60 Jahren den Bürgern und der Politik vorgibt. Die Werte des Grundgesetzes entstammen dem westlichen Kulturkreis. Sie sind das deutlichste Indiz dafür, dass die Bundesrepublik Deutschland zum Kreis der demokratischen Verfassungsstaaten des Okzidents zählt.
Additional info for Going Europe or Going Dutch (Clingendael Dissertations)
Policy practices in the corridors of the Council and European Parliament 30 Chapter 2 Governments in European Integration Theory building; the Commission DG’s and the national capitals show that large differences of opinion occur between and within the member state governments and between and within supranational institutions. The Council is by no means a coherent institution and over amendments on legislative proposals, frequent battles take place between the Commission and the Parliament. The intergovernmentalist perspective on how governments formulate, deliver and defend preferences has been subject to similar criticism.
On the other hand, there is an erosion of collective government control, as the Council of Ministers, the formal venue for national interest representation, increasingly competes with the European Parliament for legislative powers. As a result, decision-making competencies in the EU are not monopolized by national governments (Hooghe 2001, 4) but rather shared by actors at different levels. 2) For example, governance has been presented as a possible solution to coordination and legitimacy problems at the EU level and within the member states (Schout and Jordan 2005).
A second explanation is a presumed ‘logic of optimisation’. The idea is that European integration creates common problems to the member states, which have to arrange national procedures to participate in common decision-making and to implement binding EU decisions into national 41 Going Europe or Going Dutch legislative systems. The logic of optimisation predicts that over time, there is a gradual ‘convergence’ of national practices, around the most effective solutions of how to manage EU at home.