By Philippe Bonditti, Didier Bigo, Frédéric Gros
This publication addresses the chances of reading the trendy overseas during the considered Michel Foucault. The extensive variety of authors introduced jointly during this quantity query 4 of the main self-evident features of our modern world-'international', 'neoliberal', 'biopolitical' and 'global'- and hence fill major gaps in either foreign and Foucault stories. The chapters talk about what a Foucauldian viewpoint does or doesn't supply for knowing overseas phenomena whereas additionally wondering many appropriations of Foucault's paintings. This transdisciplinary quantity will function a reference for either students and scholars of diplomacy, foreign political sociology, foreign political economic system, political theory/philosophy and important concept extra generally.
Read or Download Foucault and the Modern International: Silences and Legacies for the Study of World Politics PDF
Best political economy books
The place does the ability of cash come from? Why is belief so very important in monetary operations? How does the swapping of presents vary from the trade of commodities? the place does self-interest cease and communal unity commence in capitalist economies? those concerns and lots of extra are mentioned in a rigorous, but readable, demeanour in Social Foundations of Markets, cash and credits.
This quantity brings jointly unique and well timed writings by way of across the world popular students that contemplate the present trajectories of worldwide capitalism and, within the mild of those, reflect on most probably, attainable or fascinating futures. It bargains theory-informed writing that contextualizes empirical learn on present world-historic occasions and tendencies with a watch in the direction of knowing a way forward for human, social and monetary betterment.
This arguable booklet indicates that there's extra to economics than dry versions and esoteric equations. via investigating the increase and fall of postwar Keynesianism and concentrating on the adventure of the us, the writer adopts an interdisciplinary method of exhibit that economics is rooted within the flesh and blood heritage of social clash.
To be had for the 1st time in English, this e-book examines and reinterprets type fight inside Marx and Engels’ suggestion. As Losurdo argues, category fight is usually misunderstood as completely the fight of the bad opposed to the wealthy, of the common-or-garden opposed to the strong. it really is an interpretation that's expensive to populism, one who supposes a binary common sense that closes its eyes to complexity and inclines in the direction of the get together of poverty as a spot of ethical excellence.
Additional resources for Foucault and the Modern International: Silences and Legacies for the Study of World Politics
31. 22. 32. 115. 33. Foucault, The History of Sexuality, p. 144. 34–9, for discussion. 34. Michel Foucault, Care of the Self, Volume 3 of the History of Sexuality, transl. 65, 67. 35. 67. 34–5. 37. Michel Foucault, “Preface to the 1961 edition,” History of Madness, transl. Jonathan Murphy and Jean Khalfa (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006), xxxiii. 38. Ian Hacking, “Foreword,” in Foucault, History of Madness, p. xi. 39. Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge, p. 170. 2 This has become so “natural” for us—as scholars—that we seem to be forgetting this initial split despite its immense consequences for the study of dynamics of power and politics, and their inscription in space.
Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge, transl. M. 45. 2. 90. ” “Individualities” is too awkward 30 N. ONUF for English use; “individuals,” which we find in the English translation, misses Foucault’s obvious attempt to depersonalize individual thinkers, while Hacking’s “figure” nicely captures it. 77; The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, transl. 70. 3. 45. See James Der Derian; “Critical encounters in international relations”; International Social Science Journal, 59(191) (2009): 69–73.
In those years, students attracted by politics were at a lost: the discipline of political science was not really the place to discuss politics, quite the contrary. It created dissatisfaction and search for alternatives. 10 This is how Foucault saw his course more populated than ever and welcomed the “defectors” with a surprised smile when they evoked what they were being taught within the political science departments around. They became a diaspora having much in common with their new home, and almost banned or deprived of their professional citizenship of political scientist when they were quoting Foucault.