By Stuart Shields, Ian Bruff, Huw Macartney
"This ebook provides provocative responses to contemporary debates in foreign Political financial system. It offers a miles wanted and well timed intervention to the present anodyne discussions concerning the evolution of the self-discipline and activates wider mirrored image at the nature of enquiry itself"-- pt. 1. discussion -- pt. 2. Debate -- pt. three. Dissensus
Read or Download Critical International Political Economy: Dialogue, Debate and Dissensus PDF
Best political economy books
The place does the facility of cash come from? Why is belief so vital in monetary operations? How does the swapping of presents fluctuate from the alternate of commodities? the place does self-interest cease and communal team spirit commence in capitalist economies? those matters and lots of extra are mentioned in a rigorous, but readable, demeanour in Social Foundations of Markets, cash and credits.
This quantity brings jointly unique and well timed writings via across the world well known students that think about the present trajectories of world capitalism and, within the mild of those, reflect on most likely, attainable or fascinating futures. It deals theory-informed writing that contextualizes empirical study on present world-historic occasions and tendencies with a watch in the direction of understanding a way forward for human, social and monetary betterment.
This arguable publication indicates that there's extra to economics than dry versions and esoteric equations. through investigating the increase and fall of postwar Keynesianism and targeting the event of the U.S., the writer adopts an interdisciplinary method of exhibit that economics is rooted within the flesh and blood heritage of social clash.
To be had for the 1st time in English, this e-book examines and reinterprets type fight inside Marx and Engels’ idea. As Losurdo argues, category fight is frequently misunderstood as solely the fight of the terrible opposed to the wealthy, of the standard opposed to the robust. it truly is an interpretation that's expensive to populism, one who supposes a binary common sense that closes its eyes to complexity and inclines in the direction of the social gathering of poverty as a spot of ethical excellence.
Additional resources for Critical International Political Economy: Dialogue, Debate and Dissensus
Spinning off from his theory of imperialism, Brailsford singled out the League’s failure to be more than merely a ‘League of cabinets’, and as a result its inability to deal with the material injustices at the root of global politics, as being the main cause of its lack of success. Capitalist interests were also at the root of the failure of western states to properly confront fascism. 24 Dialogue Brailsford’s international theory was an unabashedly materialist one, and until after the Second World War he was dismissive of attempts to explain global politics via more psychological or idealistic arguments.
145). Complex matrices of transport, communications and regulatory institutional infrastructures therefore emerge to facilitate a reduction in the socially average turnover time of capital (Brenner, 1998, p. 433). The production, destruction and reconstruction of these spatial configurations are therefore immanent to capitalism itself and the reproduction of capitalist social relations. This departs from the add-space-and-mix conception of critical IPE. As Brenner notes (1999b, p. 40), ‘[u]nder these circumstances, space no longer appears as a static platform of social relations, but rather as one of their constitutive dimensions, itself historically produced, reconfigured and transformed’.
This reflected class interests both at home and abroad: ‘The Tory selection [on what to defend] . . appears to be based on the indispensable, but limited principle of self-preservation . . Class, indeed, talks audibly in any attempt to define this policy’ (Brailsford, 1938b, pp. 332–3). Underlying this argument was a return to the ‘armed peace’ theory of The War of Steel and Gold. Britain and its allies were reserving their armaments for control of their own (economic) sphere, but were studiously avoiding a Lucian M.